On December 14, the FCC made a mistake. It overturned the net neutrality rule put in place by Obama's FCC in 2015. I have written to you before on this subject, explaining that the elimination of the net neutrality standard is contrary to the First Amendment guarantee to freedom of speech, as well as being harmful to small businesses.
I know those arguments didn't sway you. But today, I received notice that Minnesota's Attorney General, Lori Swanson, is planning to join other state Attorneys General in legal action to reverse the FCC's decision.
After the recent tax bill passed with NO Democratic support, Republicans would do themselves a favor by joining Democrats in a bipartisan vote to restore the 2015 net neutrality regulations. Doing so would be both good policy AND good politics, as net neutrality is supported by majorities of BOTH Republicans and Democrats in the general public.
Working to reverse this craven decision is good for America, good for your constituents, good for the Republican party, and good for Jason Lewis, It's a win-win-win-win.
Stop Demonizing the FBI
I see that the Republican propaganda network is relentlessly doing Trump's bidding in attempting to undermine both Robert Mueller and the FBI. And it appears that congressional Republicans are only too happy to join in. So I thought I would take the time to point out some facts which are obvious to everyone, and thus certainly to a smart guy like yourself:
- Like all Americans, FBI agents are entitled to their political opinions.
- Not all FBI agents are going to be Trump supporters --- and this should surprise no one, as Trump is historically unpopular, with some polls showing him at 32 percent approval.
- While I agree that FBI agents should not publicly discuss their support or opposition to a president, the text messages which started this whole ridiculous witch hunt were private, and we only know about them because they were sent on government-owned phones.
- The agents in question may think Trump is an "idiot", but they think Bernie is an "idiot" too, and "worried about what happens if HRC is elected". This is not exactly a smoking gun proving that the FBI is biased in the Democrats' favor.
- Also, Trump is, objectively speaking, an idiot.
- The bigger concern should be why the DOJ appears to have selectively leaked only the anti-Trump texts to Congress. This appears to be a clear-cut case of Trump's Justice Department interfering with an ongoing criminal investigation, by attempting to discredit both the FBI and Robert Mueller.
- The logical consequence of the Republican argument --- that it's inappropriate for Trump critics to be part of the investigation --- is that the only people qualified to investigate Trump are those who believe he's done nothing wrong. That is clearly an absurd position. It also reveals that Republicans must implicitly understand that Trump is actually guilty of wrongdoing if they don't believe his actions can withstand critical scrutiny.
- Sadly, it appears that House Republicans are now planning to use this manufactured controversy as an excuse to shut down their (admittedly Potemkin) probe into Trump's transgressions.
This last point is where you come in.
Surely, you have watched voters in Virginia and Alabama turn out in higher-than-usual numbers for an off-year election, to make sure that they vote Democrats into office. There is little doubt that these elections mark the start of a trend, which is likely to result in an electoral tsunami in 2018 which will wash Republicans out of the House of Representatives. I fully expect you to be taken out in that wave, and I expect you do, too. So I'm not writing to you on the subject of your electoral survival.
I'm writing to you about your legacy.
Four years from now, when adults once again control all the levers of power in government, the Trump administration will be remembered as a corrupt and incompetent regime of unprecedented magnitude. And when people talk of the Republican 115th Congress, do you want to be remembered as one of the dozens of Republicans who did the president's bidding in an effort to sweep his misdeeds under the rug?
Or do you want to be remembered as one of the few Republicans who took a courageous stand for the rule of law? Someone who placed principle ahead of party, and acted in the best interest of the country, despite weathering the scorn and derision of his colleagues?
I'm telling you congressman, your legacy is all you're going to have left come January 2019, and you have a very short time to build it. You know which side is the right side of history. Do you have the courage to be on it?
Jason Refuses to Disavow Support of Roy Moore from Trump, RNC
|
Jason and the Tax Bill
|
Disavowal
President Trump has decided to place politics over principle, by endorsing accused pedophile Roy Moore in order to support his right-wing agenda.
Now the RNC has followed suit, resuming their funding of Moore's campaign after previously halting it when the allegations against Moore first surfaced.
President Trump is the leader of your party. The RNC is the official face of your party. When they speak, the implicit assumption is that they speak for you as a Republican elected official.
And so, absent a clear statement from you, it is reasonable to assume that you also believe your Republican agenda is so important that it justifies putting an accused pedophile in the Senate.
I'm writing to ask that you publicly disavow both Moore and the RNC's support of him. Without such a disavowal, I will have no choice but to assume that, like Trump, you are willing to excuse a sexual assault on a child --- and likely more than one --- if it furthers your political goals. Please understand: despite our political disagreements, I WANT to see you make such a disavowal.
Please respond to let me know where I can expect to see such a disavowal published.
Update: Surprise, surprise, Jason Lewis agrees that sexual assault is bad. He is completely silent on the fact that Trump and the RNC are actively campaigning to get this monster elected to the Senate, which of course makes him complicit.
Nice work, congressman.
Now the RNC has followed suit, resuming their funding of Moore's campaign after previously halting it when the allegations against Moore first surfaced.
President Trump is the leader of your party. The RNC is the official face of your party. When they speak, the implicit assumption is that they speak for you as a Republican elected official.
And so, absent a clear statement from you, it is reasonable to assume that you also believe your Republican agenda is so important that it justifies putting an accused pedophile in the Senate.
I'm writing to ask that you publicly disavow both Moore and the RNC's support of him. Without such a disavowal, I will have no choice but to assume that, like Trump, you are willing to excuse a sexual assault on a child --- and likely more than one --- if it furthers your political goals. Please understand: despite our political disagreements, I WANT to see you make such a disavowal.
Please respond to let me know where I can expect to see such a disavowal published.
Update: Surprise, surprise, Jason Lewis agrees that sexual assault is bad. He is completely silent on the fact that Trump and the RNC are actively campaigning to get this monster elected to the Senate, which of course makes him complicit.
Nice work, congressman.
'Tax Reform' and the 2018 Campaign
Congressman Lewis,
I see that your colleagues in the Senate managed to pass their version of a 'tax reform' bill at around 2:00 AM Saturday morning, using an open and transparent process in which last-minute amendments were hastily scribbled in the margins, and Senate Democrats received notification about amendments to the bill from Washington D.C. lobbyists:
I see that your colleagues in the Senate managed to pass their version of a 'tax reform' bill at around 2:00 AM Saturday morning, using an open and transparent process in which last-minute amendments were hastily scribbled in the margins, and Senate Democrats received notification about amendments to the bill from Washington D.C. lobbyists:
This is so bad. We have just gotten list of amendments to be included in bill NOT from our R colleagues, but from lobbyists downtown. None of us have seen this list, but lobbyists have it. Need I say more? Disgusting. And we probably will not even be given time to read them. pic.twitter.com/Mn0i56JeZg— Claire McCaskill (@clairecmc) December 1, 2017
I believe this is what your president refers to as 'draining the swamp'.
Although I don't know everything that's in this bill --- because literally no one does, including the 51 Republicans in the Senate who voted for it --- I feel compelled to write to you about it immediately. I feel this urgency because I'm confident that, like the last two Republican bills to destroy health care in America, the more people learn about it, the less popular it will become (and it's already pretty darn unpopular, with one poll showing only 25% support). And since I believe that Paul Ryan has the same steadfast commitment to transparency and the democratic process as Senate Republicans do, I anticipate that he'll try to ram through a vote to approve the Senate bill as quickly as possible. Perhaps even before I can finish writing this letter.
Now, I expect you'll vote for this awful bill, because Republicans believe that they need a 'win', and because you expressed great pride about the similarly awful bill that you voted for in the House. So instead of asking you to vote against the Senate bill or anything similar that might be devised via reconciliation, I'm simply writing to ask which parts of the bill you believe will be most helpful to you during your upcoming re-election campaign. Choose one or more from the following:
- Jason Lewis voted to increase deficit by anything from $1.6 trillion to $1.8 trillion by 2027, if the alleged economic growth spurred by the tax cuts doesn't materialize --- and anything from $500 billon to $1.3 trillion even if it does.
- Jason Lewis voted to eliminate exemptions for children and other dependents.
- Jason Lewis voted to eliminate the deduction for teachers who buy supplies for their classroom (House bill only).
- Jason Lewis voted to slash corporate tax rates from 35% to 20% --- less than the rate many middle-income families pay.
- Jason Lewis voted to slash taxes for millionaires, while Americans earning less than $75,000 are more likely to see a tax increase by 2027 than a cut.
- Jason Lewis voted to authorize oil drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge.
- Jason Lewis voted to end the individual mandate of the Afforable Care Act, eliminating health insurance for an estimated 13 million Americans and increasing premiums by 10% for everyone else. One expert predicted this would lead to "ballooning premiums that will crush millions of families".
- Jason Lewis voted to cut $25 billion from Medicare to pay more more tax cuts for the richest of the rich.
- And Jason Lewis voted for all of these things in order to spur the economy to a mere 0.1% increased growth rate over each of the next 10 years, or less than 1% total by 2027.
Please get back to me ASAP and let me know which of these items you would most like for voters to have in mind when they enter the voting booth next November.
Update: Jason responds.
Update: Jason responds.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)